The technology industry should be powerful

The technology industry should be the most powerful political coalition in the history of man. 

Great founders are some of the most relentless, intelligent, talented people in the world, and they’ve built institutions faster than anyone in human history. 

Meta has tens of thousands of employees, Alphabet has hundreds of thousands, and Amazon has millions. However, their wins in the political arena are limited to DoD contracts and lowering EU fines. 

I think this has to do with the psychographics of our industry. Tech founders are sigmas. We do things our own way. We get mad at incumbents and build startups. We don’t immerse ourselves in powerful institutions; we get frustrated with them and leave. There are virtues to this orientation, but it results in a lack of understanding of bureaucracy, particular institutions, and ultimately power itself. 

Libertarians are often the worst offenders. After axiomatically refuting the morality of government, they content themselves with writing essays, hosting debates, and giving speeches. Seriousness about theory necessitates praxis, which is itself knowledge-generating. 

The Thiel Fellowship is not a replacement for Harvard. It’s a genius PR play — communicating a world view by making a contrarian prediction about an institution’s demise, concretized through charismatic example after example after example of people making life-altering decisions that undeniably convey their commitment to that world view. But ultimately, it does not displace Harvard as a source of institutional power. It’s a sigma move. 

Firing Claudine Gay was Alpha. Finance understands power, immerses itself in it, and occasionally takes radical action when profitable. 

Substack does not obviate the need for NYT's value prop. New business models could collapse the NYT, but there is still a need for an institution that tells elites what the Truth is. Reframing Exit vs. Voice, we should consider Startup vs. Acquisition. 

To change the world, tech needs to understand institutional power, and get it. 

I’m working on a few projects along these lines. Reach out if interested. 

3 responses
Yes, some tech founders exist outside institutions and institutional narratives. That is precisely why they have the insights they do. The moment they adopt your Wall Street bro approach, that insight breaks down. Moreover, we can't adopt it because we aren't part of your cult of worthless cunts. This misunderstanding likely comes from you never having built anything besides a Lego set. You consider yourself an "Alpha," someone who plays power games and believes that is the path to change. But that's exactly what makes you antithetical to real innovation. There is a reason truly innovative founders leave and exit the system. The power game is not worth pursuing; it’s not worth engaging with charlatans like yourself. Use your brain and/or limbs to build something—anything. Then you'll understand the immediate disdain for folks who claim to be "Alpha." My recommendation for "Sigmas"? Start to shame and punish those who take without giving. Leadership is about giving; "Alphas" do not provide. Also, you have a funny view of power, in my opinion. Did you see a real, potentially fruitful (yet always doomed) city project was scrapped yesterday? Now imagine continuing to post shit like this and Roman imagery. Pretty queer. A final aside, the use of astrology-adjacent terminology is pretty fucking hilarious for someone who isn't fifteen and engaged with Tiktok all day.
2 visitors upvoted this post.